Sports shots are among the toughest to take. The photographer needs to know something about the sport, where the action might be, how the "flow" will move to take in players and where good positions are for the best camera angles.

That's also just the beginning, the understanding of the subject and its movement. The lighting and the speed with which participants will move also has to be considered, as does the lens focal length to use (telephoto or wide angle?) and how fast to set the "film speed". Of course, digital cameras don't use "film", but many have settings for the CCD's sensitivity to light, usually from 100 up to 1600, with 1600 being the fastest (and most "grainy") response to light.
For these photos, I used a shutter priority setting (choosing my shutter speed of 1/100 second) to keep my shutter speed constant and a ISO (film speed) setting of 1600 (the lights aren't great in the Bangor Auditorium) and most of the time my f-stop was fairly open (between f-5.6 and f-11) so the depth of field was narrow at times.
OK, so which of these photos do you like best and why? Maybe some "tweets" on composition or things that might improve them. Or even pick out a single element or principle of design that is working well. Thanks a million, I hope you are all having a great vacation. GO TROJANS!